Witnesses from the education community were urgent about this issue because of their daily experience, in the classroom and at recess, of the impact of violent television programming on children. If the popular TV shows feature aggressive images, teachers see this kind of action.

Most educators were not concerned that blocking out violent programs could be interpreted as censorship or limiting freedom of expression. They felt that the goal of protecting children has top priority, and that the freedoms we enjoy in society are associated with responsibilities. Educators applauded the voluntary actions taken by broadcasters, but felt that regulations and laws were still necessary.

They stressed the need to inform parents about the effects of violent TV, and about the technological aids to help them control what their children watch.

With regard to media education:

Educators recognized the importance of teaching students and parents about the impact of the media, but stressed that they did not have the time, money or resources for the job
Many said that media literacy courses should ideally be linked to core studies. But others pointed out that teachers are already spread too thin, and that it would be unrealistic to ask them to take on another area with no extra resources or training.

One group recommended that an information package on media awareness (with student input) be developed and distributed by provincial departments of education. It also called for a national media literacy campaign, similar to the ones that the government has supported in its fight against cigarette smoking, drug use, and drinking and driving.

The education community welcomed new technologies to help parents control the television set. They felt, however, that those solutions won't reach those who need it most - since children most at risk are in homes where they are already neglected, and where parents can't afford or won't use such safeguards.